Lord Denning大概是最说人话的法官吧，每个判决开头都有个有时候还挺幽默的小故事总结一下material facts。很多时候从这里的用词就能知道他比较偏向哪一方。
他在自传里还以莎士比亚自比了一番：
I start my judgment, as it were with a prologue – as the chorus does in one of Shakespeare』s plays – to introduce the story. Then I go from act to act as Shakespeare does – each with its scenes drawn from real life… I draw the characters as they truly were – using their real names… I avoid long sentences like the plague because they lead to obscurity. It is no good if the hearer cannot follow them… I know that people are prone not to accept my view unless they have support in the books. But never at much length. Only a sentence or two. I avoid all reference to pleadings and orders. They are mere lawyers』 stuff, they are unintelligible to everyone else. I finish with a conclusion – an epilogue – again as the chorus does in Shakespeare. In it I gather the threads together and give the result.
