去年的一篇journal of climate 的paper, 三個reviewer一共一頁半的comments. 引用幾句得瑟一下有史以來最容易修改的投稿：

It was pleasure to read this paper, because it is very informative about the current state of art regarding... This paper is also very well written and well structured, with a very nice set of figures that are very easy to interpret. It is actually hard to recommend improvements.

well justified and well interpreted paper. I enjoyed reading this manuscript and learned a lot.

謝邀！

我遇到過的評價最好的審稿意見是這樣的（翻譯為中文，我稍稍潤色了一下）：我看到這篇文章的題目和摘要，我覺得一定是遇到了我生命中一直在等待的那篇文章。它一定會改變世界，至少是我的世界。所以我滿懷熱情，努力在結冰的湖面上蹣跚前行，就為了早點回到書房來閱讀它。

好了，以上就是最美好的部分。

至於說其他的部分，如果你們想看的話，別怪我沒提醒你們：但是，看了正文的開頭之後，我的熱情就被冰水澆滅。該作者顯然完全不了解該領域的最新進展，其研究方法也經不起推敲。我不想再對這篇文章有任何的評價。它毀了我一天的好心情！

第一次投會議得到：

This paper is trying to solve an essential challenge with a few new ideas worth of publishing

Rebuttal後被拒差點抑鬱退學，但這句話激勵我哪怕是死了，釘在棺材裡了，也要用腐朽的手把它發出去。

於是第二次投到更高級的雜誌上得到：

The topics studied in this paper are very important and can be the key to the development of clinically useful computer aided diagnosis solutions

大修後接收。

可能只有AE看rebuttal的會議比的就是誰槽點更少吧。

2001-2011年間，《Environmental Microbiology》每年都會發布一份「審稿意見集錦」，其中2010年那篇因審稿意見十分毒舌與搞笑在網上廣為流傳，小編在下面這篇回答中整理了部分毒舌意見，

你見過最狠的SCI評論是什麼??

www.zhihu.com圖標

今天讓我們再來看看評價最好的審稿意見有哪些：

被誇的天花亂墜型：

One might call this not only a skillfully executed paper but also well-rounded and thorough, with unique aspects of microbial systematics and biochemistry The experimental work with chemostats is excellent. I have little to offer other than praise and a few minor comments.[1]

這篇論文不僅寫得很巧妙，而且全面透徹，在微生物系統學和生物化學方面都有獨到之處。化學抑製劑的實驗工作非常出色。除了讚揚和一些小意見，我根本挑不出其它的毛病。

It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well-conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish.[1]

審閱這樣的稿子總能令人十分享受：文章從頭到尾都構思得當、執行得當、書寫得當。語言乾淨利落而且直白。

I found the manuscript to be well performed in all aspects, from the experimental design to the writing of the manuscript. I wish all manuscripts I review were of this quality.[1]

這篇稿件從實驗設計到內容的呈現，各個方面都表現得非常好。要是以後交給我審閱的稿件都能這麼優秀就好了。

審稿人有點「欠」型：

This is a long, but excellent report. I had considered asking for EMSAs, but these will not significantly improve the study. It hurts me a little to have so little criticism of a manuscript.[1]

報告很長，但很出色。我有想過該研究需要增加凝膠阻滯實驗，但發現這對改善研究幫助並不大。哎呀，沒能在稿件中找出什麼毛病，我還有點失望呢......

過節很嗨型：

Season』s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days.[1]

致以季節問候！很抱歉回復的這麼晚，因為一隻烤鵝讓我耽擱了好幾天。

Merry X-mas! First, my recommendation was reject with new submission, because it is necessary to investigate further, but reading a well written manuscript before X-mas makes me feel like Santa Claus.[1]

聖誕快樂！首先，我建議先拒稿（作者修改後）再重新提交，因為目前稿件內容需要進一步的研究。但是在聖誕節前讀到這麼好的文章讓我有種自己是聖誕老人的感覺~

精品文章推薦閱讀：

  • 【文獻】研究生們剛開始看英文文獻是怎麼看的？；
  • 【論文】六個步驟搞定SCI論文寫作；
  • 【Cover Letter】教你寫一篇讓編輯一見鍾情的投稿信；
  • 【Graphical Abstract】圖文摘要應該如何設計？
  • 【投稿】手把手教你搞定在線投稿！；
  • 【狀態】SCI論文投稿後的各種狀態，你都知道嗎？
  • 【返修】絕對乾貨：回復論文審稿意見的六大技巧；

參考

  1. ^abcdefNone. Referees quotes – 2010[J]. Microbial Biotechnology, 2010, 12(12), 3303–3304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02394.x

編輯於 04-09繼續瀏覽內容知乎發現更大的世界打開Chrome繼續AlienAlienI am just a pure Alien！

This paper reports very interesting and important results. The quality and originality are very high. I believe in the correctness of the understanding of the subject they show in the paper. Personally, Im very much interested in the phenomena related to the substrate. Im much interested in the physical difference between the smooth, corrugated, and orthogonal surfaces. The quality and the importance of the paper are worth publication in POF.

這是最近科室做液滴碰壁的師弟投稿POF後，一審一位審稿人的意見，全是讚美之詞，一個修改意見都沒有。厲害在於這可是一審意見！

稿子返回直接接收，著實niubility啊～

This paper reports very interesting and important results. The quality and originality are very high. I believe in the correctness of the understanding of the subject they show in the paper. Personally, Im very much interested in the phenomena related to the substrate. Im much interested in the physical difference between the smooth, corrugated, and orthogonal surfaces. The quality and the importance of the paper are worth publication in POF.

這是最近科室做液滴碰壁的師弟投稿POF後，一審一位審稿人的意見，全是讚美之詞，一個修改意見都沒有。厲害在於這可是一審意見！

稿子返回直接接收，著實niubility啊～

推薦閱讀：
相关文章