準備down下來精讀一遍再來更新答案

已舉報

「多數」的結論從何而來？

我讀過的文獻也不太多，僅就我讀過的而言，並沒有如題主所說的多數，研究者們對於自己的發現基本都還是客觀描述，即使是在discussion或implication進行解讀時，多數是中性。先列舉一些讀過的：

• Steinbacher, R., Gilroy, F. D. (1985). Preference for Sex of Child Among Primiparous Women. The Journal of Psychology, 119(6), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1985.9915461

When queried about desired sex of their first child, the dominant response (59%) selected by pregnant women in the present sample was no preference.This finding was in stark contrast to the clear preference for a son demonstrated by samples of college students, as well as the earlier findings sampling pregnant women. ... Equally discrepant from earlier research was the finding that, of those pregnant women who indicated a preference, the majority actually chose to have a girl first. This preference was not significant, but it is the first published finding that does not indicate a boy preference no matter what the sample. ... The most obvious explanation is that society is becoming less biased, adn hence, male and female infants are perceived as equally valuable and desirable.

腦補：如果我有惡意，應該開始吐槽女性不按進化法則來偏好男孩子了。

• Spence, J. T., Losoff, M., Robbins, A. S. (1991). Sexually Aggressive Tactics in Dating Relationships: Personality and Attitudinal Correlates. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1991.10.3.289

As for the dating situation in particular, in a societally permissive climate in which it is accepted that sexual intimacies may begin as early as the first date and culminate in intercourse more frequently and more rapidly than was the case several decades ago, it is not surprising that yound men who have a general problem with impulse control tend to put more pressure on an unenthusiastic or resistant date than those with better control. Conventional sex-role attitudes and beliefs that demean women were also significantly related to sexually aggressive behaviors, these attitudes appearing to provide justification and impetus to mens use of coercive tactics.

The suggestion that women ought to take reasonable precautions to protect themselves does not in any sense reduce mens responsibility for their actions. Both sexes must learn, in particular, that women have a right to say no and to have their refusal respected.

腦補：如果我有惡意，我建議男性學啥？

• Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., Brooks, R. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35), 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115

Findings suggest that women are sensitive to income inequality when they sexualize or enhance their appearance, enacting these behaviors in environments where competition is fierce and attracting, a high-quality mate confers relatively great advantages. The conditional nature of these behaviors and the lack of evidence that gender inequality drives sexualization raises the possibility that sexualization may be an agentic and strategic act for some women.

腦補：要有惡意這段話應該就不會停止於只是用agentic和strategic來形容了。

（慢慢整理再更）

「為何知乎出現的大多數心理學提問者，他們的提問水平都極其低下，卻還不以為意？」

問題描述：例如本題。

1. 弗洛伊德和勒龐並不是大多數，而且兩個人的理論在心理學和社會學中都有爭議
2. 弗洛伊德和女性的關係明明很好，一點都沒有惡意
3. 甚至弗洛伊德對性的態度，解放了西方女性的思想，他是婦女之友好嘛～

惡，惡，惡意？

歷史上什麼樣我不懂，但現今的心理學系，男女比例你清楚嗎？

雖然不至於像隔壁教育學那麼誇張，但陰盛陽衰是沒跑的。

在這個前提下，怎麼會有「多數的」惡意啊……

並沒有