now i got a little homunculus saying 「hmm... do i really need to be a try hard and prove myself or should i be like all these other examiners who dun give two futz about internet trolls?」 the homunculus won me over
u gotta add me on wechat for me to show you, but trolls are gonna be trolls lol / no amount of evidence is good enough for trolls like u =3
and i m not lying about finding out who u r and suing ur face lol
但這位老師其實也並沒有正確的使用這種系統，因為這種系統的特性是——句子要盡量簡單，所以不會出現add me on wechat for me to show you這種相對複雜的句子結構，然後trolls 後面跟的是are而不是簡寫，這也不符合這種用語的習慣——相當於，老鐵666，你媽通知你回家吃飯一樣。
但其實正式的寫法中，add me on wechat for me to show you也是很奇怪的用法，很明顯這句話是先中式思維——加我微信我好展示給你，然後翻譯成英文的。而不是按照英語的習慣——在微信上我展示給你(Ill show you on wechat)。
Housing affordability is the lowest in Hong Kong and Tokyo. Though the tax rate is quite low, the low wages of 3 pounds per hour and the super high monthly rent for 4-bedroom flat in HK, which costs 2,400 pounds, makes HK a city with unaffordable housing.
Housing problem is most severe in Hong Kong and Tokyo. Despite relatively low tax rate, the minimum wage in Hong Kong is only 3 pounds per hour, while an ordinary 4-bedroom flat there can cost 2,400 pounds. Housing affordability is draining the vitality from this city.
三。大作文：508字，單數動詞不加s（長）
謝謝有知友指出是學生習作(我是老師我肯定不會改成這樣)，那我又看到了他自己的文章：
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/sdIsbWTBhGAvCM9ksQuKJw
我就隨便說四點，感興趣的話我可以再加：
1。「how irrational the claim made by the topic is. 」這裡真的是很奇怪的用法。。。相當於「被題目做出的聲明真是不理性了」，不是人話。
2。「does have an effect on the type and the amount of aid that one can give」謝謝知友指出：「其他地方贊同你，不過關於effect那個地方，have an effect on sb or sth是個固定用法，可以理解為exert influence on sb/sth，用中文翻譯過來，可以看作對人或事造成一種影響或結果。」我又查了一下字典確認了一下，在這裡更正一下。也可以用affect。
3。「it is his or her willingness to help that determines the likelihood of an altruistic behavior.」再一次的句子沒有原因的堆疊和毫無意義的強調。「真是他的幫助意願決定了善行發生的可能性」
4。「we must first see that this is not doable」這個絕對不是本土英語者的使用習慣： check/analyse/estimate/figure out….任何一個都不會是see，只有中文會說我們要「看」,後面的那個doable沒問題，但前面一口一個altruistic behaviour,後面用太直白的doable明顯不匹配。
5。「one must first define the parameters so as to have a system of differentiation」 - 一般其實正確的是說it needs to first，但你看翻譯成中文「一個人要首先確定參數來產生一個區分的系統」，是不是就很順。。。同理"However, the word importance is highy subjective..."——「但是呢，重要這個詞是很主觀的。。。直譯成中文就很順。。。但其實英語裡面，subjective的不是word這個詞，而是定義，所以應該用definition，或者說what is important。如果要再考慮到語氣和氣勢的話，甚至可以說who are we to decide what is important..
另一篇號稱是9份作文：
再來一彈 9 分範文?mp.weixin.qq.com
1. 範文508個詞。。。這個是雅思考試常識——不建議考生寫超過350。。。
2. 「 I might have to 」 這個是禮貌性表達我不得不這樣做的意思——「sorry I might have to call the police./Sorry I might have to escalate to your manager.」但就說一個道理，有什麼可Might have to的。。。
3. 「 There is of course a casual definition of what 「waste」 means, and usually it means 「the stuff that I dont approve of,」 but the take home message is that this rests entirely on how the word 「waste」 is defined.「——翻譯成中文根本不是人話：「當然是有一個浪費的定義，通常它的意思是「我不同意的東西」，但重要的信息(結論)是這完全取決於「浪費「是如何定義的。」這麼多字下來有什麼有意義的話嗎？英語也還是人類的語言，你寫這個絕對是減分的。
4. 「The kind of myopic thinking exhibited in the paragraph above」exhibit在英語裡面用的時候，一定是要有視覺的意向在裡面，動作行為等等，但並不適用於這裡抽象的由文章展示，但again，翻成中文你會覺得還挺順溜的。。所以這個就是中文思維，看中文翻譯然後胡亂使用。。。
5.「Many consider scientific research a waste because.." - waste作為單數名次的時候後面必須用a waste of something。。不能單獨使用。唯一的例外就是what a waste。
6. the time, energy, and efforts put in research are to no avail. 這裡再一次的，to no avail表現的是一種持續的努力徒勞無用的挫敗感，有一種很強的畫面感——My attempts to improve the situation were of little/no avail.而這裡很明顯作者的情感中是沒有努力嘗試然後失敗的挫折感的，所以這裡用這個詞是一種情感上的錯位，相當於「父親死了，他在墓碑前面回憶起過往的趣事，破涕為笑」。語法上來說都沒有問題，但很明顯是錯的。
7.「does take a ton of money」 - 這個真的是低水平的錯誤-只能用it takes..而不能用something does take...
8. 「The enormous amount of time..., money.. and manpower..., and the energy and resources... are all well worth it if the product of the research is as applicable as it is valid. 」這句話真的是臭又長。。。因為其實就是並列幾個詞語然後加上從句修飾句式上一點也不複雜，但說了這麼半天才開始說主要的結構，這個就叫做「頭重腳輕」。英語的結構是先把主要信息交代出來，然後再不停的增加信息，來進行修飾。。。還有就是product of research——再一次的，Product是產品，不是產物的意思。。
9.「contradiction between what is hypothesized and what the empirical data suggest」 - 句子寫到最後自己都忘了寫到哪裡了。。。what the empirical data suggest[s] - 單數加單數。。。還有就是what is hypothesized - 被動以及從句用法for what benefit? hypothesis可以得為什麼要用奇奇怪怪的結構？
10.「the difficulties involved in making the sciences applicable to real life are oftentimes too great」確實是有great difficulties,但這並不代表著可以說difficulties are great。。。
11. "...rankest psychologism of all."你想說的是心理現象，但psychologism是唯心主義。。。我覺得你不會用就別瞎用。。。唯心主義和你之前的那段話有什麼關係？
12.「doesn』t allow the people to see past the immediate return」中文翻譯過來一點毛病沒有，但首先see這個詞用在這裡不妥我不計較了，past絕對很奇怪，這個時候應該用beyond。。。還有雅思不應該用縮寫。
13.「potential that lies within」 - 沒必要用定於從句，potential lying within。說實話這個句子本來就夠長了最後再用定語從句真的有一種喘不過氣的感覺。。
14.「Certain fact or knowledge」 - 哪些certain？這裡應該用some。你後面也用了might表示不確定，前面又用certain有一種精神分裂的感覺。
15.「surmount to anything 」你這裡其實應該用的是achieve。。。理由是surmount單指克服，如果要是用克服作動詞的話，後面應該跟problems/obstacles/hurdles/opposition/objections等等。。你out of no where說科學不能克服任何東西不覺得很奇怪嗎？
If this matter is not resolved by the time specified above, I reserve the right to commence legal proceedings to recover the debt without further notice to you and this letter may be tendered in court as evidence of your failure to pay. Legal action may result in you having to pay legal costs, interest and could impact on your credit history.
Once it has been over two years since you took the TOEFL, your expired scores will disappear from the TOEFL website. You won』t be able to view or send them anymore.
While we can never know to what extent their participation contributed to their unhappiness, new rules should support contestants, while ensuring that the makers of current affairs, news, and other factual programmes are free to get on with their jobs.
但是我沒有說我做過考官，只說了我現在 在 manage a moderately-sized social media platform
part 2 我沒做筆記，也沒有照著topic 中的小標題說，有什麼說什麼，反正決定分數都在 part 3 （完全依照我口語減法課中的方式操作）
celebrity influence 這個爛題也聊過N遍了
決定我 9 分原因還是因為我的 frame of reference
我聊到 Tom Cruise 和 John Travolta
how messed up scientology really is
how religion is a man-made construct for mass control
整個重心圍繞著 influence 和 manipulation
出來了之後兩個監考人員不知為何跟我聊了起來
在談話中他們透露出我考的不錯，我不知道是否機考人員在上傳考生聽力閱讀答案後就知道他們幾分了？
這個我不能確定，我問了他們：」你們是直接就知道了嗎？」
他們回答：」不管怎樣，你的成績最快 5天後才會出」 我好像知道了些什麼
整體來說，這次是一個好的經歷，也是我超越自己的經歷
現在開始，我既是一個雅思前考官，也是個不用去尼泊爾考也能夠寫作9口語9 的考生
出門的時候，告訴我我考了 9 分，雅思禁止我考試了
我騙你的，如果你還相信雅思會被禁考這樣的鬼話我勸你乖乖的去看病
聽力我會繼續加油的
希望大家繼續支持我（打假，寫學術po文，造有效的練習材料）
馬上就要過新年了，一但新書一出，我的 focus就會轉移到做工具書，寫作練習側上
米米3.0敬請期待～
—————————分割線—————————
@墟煙 debate?? or r u gonna chicken out??
i』ve posted my toefl and SAT score on my 「f-circle」 go check it out
and as stated in appendix 4 you need a ielts band 9 or equivalent (CPE highest tier) to be an examiner... contrary to whatever some dude in the comment have stated... (he said u only need a 7 to an examiner — false / get ur facts checked)
ps. 你們造的小號互相點讚好容易看得出來的喔。。是不是有人開始要跟我道歉你們急了？哈哈哈
There』s a lady by the name 墟煙 trying to point out the mistakes i』ve made in my speech... i find that both hilarious and intriguing... hilarious... well for obvious reasons... intriguing becuz i didnt know how ignorant a person can be until now... so, this is what i suggest... u wish to correct my chinglish? do it in my face... lets do a live debate on ielts topics and have another american or british third party as a bystand... lets see how its gonna play out~ be there or be square~
4. 最後，大家來看一下那個全英文匿名「美國」答主的神邏輯：一個英語是母語的澳洲人，用自己私人時間拿iPad錄了一個16分鐘長的視頻，就是為了把一個second language learner寫的答案硬說成是自己寫的。
哈哈哈，我猜是因為該「美國人」 無法否認錄視頻的不是native speaker，又不願意承認已經被他說成是second language learner寫的答案確實是出自錄視頻的那個人，導致他不得不睜著眼睛說瞎話，強行說錄視頻的和寫答案的不是同一個人。我想說，如果是這樣的話，我覺得我朋友應該去當演員，畢竟這「神一樣的演技」，可以拿最佳男演員獎了吧。也歡迎大家親自看看下面的兩段視頻，來自行判斷真假。
結束語：If you call somebody』s bluff, you』d better be damn sure they are bluffing.
—————以下是澳洲朋友的原答案：寫於昨日（2019.8.4）
First of all, I』m going to preface this comment with the fact that I am a native English speaker in Australia, born and bred, and have received higher/tertiary education, hopping from law, to psychology, to physics, and finally settling on a degree in computing. My beloved Chinese friend sought my opinion on this topic, so here it is.
From my brief appraisal of this heated discussion, the heat primarily being generated by the friction created primarily by 「Reme」 attempting to divert attention, and escape from an entirely fair and reasonable scrutiny, I have come to a conclusion, which is this.
Combined with a number of logical, syntactical, and grammatical errors in the supposed sample essay (e.g. 「sole importance」, missing a comma in the first paragraph, misuse of 「irrational」, the topic itself asking a question of degree (not making a claim), clumsy repetition nearing the point of alliteration, inappropriate use of 『ergo』 when 『therefore』 provides better flow, etc.), the overall presentation is hilariously florid and imprecise.
On the larger question of 「Reme」』s legitimacy, and those defending him based on his supposed history, I have one thing to say: That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
